Earlier
this month Adam Grant (a Wharton Business School Professor) posted a blog on
the Huffington Post Emotional
Intelligence is Overrated. The blog
went viral in the Twittersphere.
Grant
described how he thought a CEO who considered EQ to be more important than IQ
and who was spending millions on training and EQ assessment was wasting his
company’s money. In the end they agreed
to a study which using hundreds of salespeople demonstrated that IQ was 5 times
more powerful that EQ in determining compensation. Grant then quoted a meta-analysis by Dana
Joseph and Dan Newman which demonstrated that IQ accounted for 14% of job
performance and EQ only 1%. However after
convincingly arguing the case that EQ is overrated Grant then backtracks saying
that it is a set of skills that can be useful particularly in jobs where
emotions are important such as sales (even though his own study showed it was
not).
Part of the problem stems back to Daniel Goleman. Unfortunately his book Emotional
Intelligence contained the subtitle “Why It Can Matter More Than IQ”. Since the book’s publication in 1995 many EQ
practitioners have converted the result that IQ accounts for job 20% of
performance into a hypothesis that EQ will predict 80% of future performance. Even Daniel Goleman has publically
disavowed the 80% hypothesis yet it is still continually repeated. However what Goleman puts forward and I agree
is that once “once you’re in a high-IQ position, intellect loses its power to
determine who will emerge as a productive employee or an effective leader. For
that, how you handle yourself and your relationships — in other words, the
emotional intelligence skill set — matters more than your IQ.”
I have an interesting confirmation of this which I use in my
training programs. One question we discuss is
the ideal components of leadership. I
ask my participants which are the two most important components from the
following list:
·
Change Agent
·
Ethics
·
Flexibility
·
Intelligence
·
People skills
·
Self management
·
Strategic thinker
·
Team player
·
Visionary
The
list was taken from a study done for the Karpin report (1994) which asked 100
experienced business managers from Australia’s largest organisations the same
question. “People skills” was ranked far
and away the most important component.
(Ethics, by the way ranked stone motherless last.) I have been running workshops since the early
1990s and my experience has been that the more senior the manager the higher
the ranking of “people skills”.
So
while I differ from Grant do not think that EQ is overrated I do agree with
another statement in his blog namely EQ and IQ are correlated. IQ is the capacity to learn. The
higher your IQ, the easier it is for you to develop emotional intelligence. However the key to emotional intelligence is understanding
your core emotions compared to your transient emotions. Your core emotions are driven by your
temperament – what you are genetically born with. Based on a study of 11,000 identical twins
nature is around twice as important as nurture.
I have found the Humm-Wadsworth model of seven core emotions the most
practical tool for people to use and once understood (takes a day) dramatically
lifts their emotional intelligence.
People
drive performance, emotions drive people, temperament drives emotions.
No comments:
Post a Comment