In this
book Ghaemi puts forward an hypothesis that he calls The Inverse Law of Sanity. According to him most of our leaders are exceedingly
sane men such as Neville Chamberlain who in times of normality perform
well. However in times of crisis display
such people demonstrate lacklustre leadership.
Instead in such times the best leaders are those with mood
disorders. Ghaemi argues his case using
such leaders as Abraham Lincoln, Gen. William T.
Sherman, Winston Churchill, Mohandas Gandhi, Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F.
Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Ted Turner among others. In particular Ghaemi contends these leaders
owe much of their success because they were suffering some form of Bipolar
Personality Disorder, either the full blown disorder itself or some milder
variant such as hyperthymia (mild mania), dysthymia (mild depression), or
cyclothymia (alternating between lows and highs in mood and energy.
The core of mania is impulsivity
with heightened energy. Increased levels of mania usually mean creativity and sociability
but if it is too pronounced it can lead to irritability, promiscuous sexuality,
and lavish spending (eg Kennedy and Roosevelt).
On the other hand according to Ghaemi depressed people are not depressed
because they distort reality; they are depressed because they see reality more
clearly than other people do. Depressed
people also have more empathy, resilience and creativity. I can agree with empathy but with regard to
resilience I beg to differ. It is people
with low levels of the Depressive component in their personality who have high
resilence. Also it is mania that leads
to creativity (the flight of ideas) not depression.
As
someone who promotes the Humm-Wadsworth model of temperament this was a
compelling book to read. Temperament is
how your genetic make-up defines how you react emotionally. The Humm-Wadsworth says that your reactions
are determined on where you fall in the spectrum of the seven most common
mental illnesses. It is here that I have
difficulty with the book. Ghaemi appears
to see everything through the lens of Manic-Depression.
Kretschmer was the first person to
define the Cyclothymic (ie Manic-Depressive) mental disorder but he also
defined another disorder, the Schizothymic (or Autistic-Paranoid). Surely the one characteristic of all leaders
is high levels of paranoia. Andy Grove
said it best in his eponymous book: Only
the Paranoid Survive. I find it difficult
to accept Ghaemi’s thesis that Nixon was a homoclite or a person or with normal
behaviour. Like all successful
politicians Nixon was well to right of the Paranoid spectrum with an
overpowering desire to compete and win.
His downfall could be attributed to a severe paranoia for chasing demons
that maybe did not exist and resorting to tactics that were not necessary.
On the
other hand I found many of the biographies very interesting and discovered
much. Non USA citizens in particular
will learn a lot about the USA reading this book. Ghaemi himself was born in Iran and moved to
the USA when he was five years old. Dr.
Ghaemi is a world-class psychiatrist; and is one of the world’s experts on
issues of mood disorder so his emphasis on Manic-Depression is
understandable. No matter how hard we
try, avoiding confirmation bias is almost impossible.
No comments:
Post a Comment